Opinion: Pixel Watch is more likely now a decent WearOS processor is available

Ryan Daws is a senior editor at TechForge Media, with a seasoned background spanning over a decade in tech journalism. His expertise lies in identifying the latest technological trends, dissecting complex topics, and weaving compelling narratives around the most cutting-edge developments. His articles and interviews with leading industry figures have gained him recognition as a key influencer by organisations such as Onalytica. Publications under his stewardship have since gained recognition from leading analyst houses like Forrester for their performance. Find him on X (@gadget_ry) or Mastodon (@gadgetry@techhub.social)


Rumours of a Pixel Watch are now more believable following the release of a competent WearOS processor.

Unlike wearables from Apple and Samsung, Google relies heavily on third-parties. The main reason WearOS manufacturers have struggled is the inability to access hardware which can compete with the in-house chips used by Apple and Samsung for their wearables.

The main critiques of WearOS devices are they’re slow and have poor battery life. The OS didn’t help in the early days – it was a bloated system based on the smartphone version of Android – but it’s gone on a diet in recent years. What has continued to hold WearOS back is the lack of a decent processor.

Chipset maker Qualcomm has understandably focused its resources on making stellar processors for smartphones. With Apple and Samsung dominating the wearable market, and manufacturers abandoning Google’s platform, a wearable chipset just wasn’t Qualcomm’s priority.

Smartphone sales have slumped dramatically in recent years. It’s likely there will be some uptick as people upgrade to 5G, but the smartphone boom is pretty much over. Qualcomm will be looking for new sources of revenue.

While Apple and Samsung are dominating the wearables market, it’s still a relatively small market overall. Most people now have smartphones in their pockets but the vast majority don’t have a smartwatch on their wrists.

Qualcomm surprised us with two new WearOS processors this week, the Snapdragon Wear 4100 and the Snapdragon Wear 4100+.

The last WearOS processor from Qualcomm was the Wear 3100 in 2018. The 3100 was a minor upgrade to the 2100 which debuted in 2016 (in fact, they even use the same main processor.)

The processor in the 3100 and 2100 was based on the archaic 28nm process. The 4100, however, gets with the times and jumps to a 12nm process which Qualcomm says will provide around 25 percent battery life.

Elsewhere, we’re getting four A53 CPU cores in the 4100 clocked at 1.7GHz – replacing the 3100’s A7 cores, which ran at just 1.1GHz. Qualcomm is estimating the 4100 will provide more than 85 percent faster performance than the 3100 on the CPU side. The new Adreno A504 GPU, meanwhile, will be up to two and a half times faster than the Adreno A304 in the previous chipset.

As for the 4100+, the difference is the inclusion of a co-processor which is typically used for the “Watch Mode” on many smartwatches to increase battery life by limiting features. The QCC1110 co-processor in the 4100+ can now display up to 64,000 colours (up from the 16 colors that the 3100 could show) in addition to supporting features like step tracking, continuous heart-rate tracking, and more which previously relied on the main processor.

Long story short, this is the first decent processor available for WearOS.

There would have been little point in Google releasing a Pixel Watch before now when it wouldn’t have been able to provide any better performance than existing WearOS smartwatches. Now the Wear 4100 is available, it’s a very different story.

Qualcomm has said it’s already shipping the 4100 to device manufacturers. TicWatch maker Mobvoi has confirmed it’s making a new smartwatch featuring the new chips. All eyes, however, are on Google.

Google purchased Fitbit for $2.1 billion earlier this year – a small sum for Google, but still not the kind of money you’d splash on a wearable maker if you have no interest in, y’know, making wearables.

You’ve got the Pixel smartphone, Pixel Buds, Pixelbook… there’s a smartwatch-shaped hole in that lineup. I wouldn’t be surprised to see it filled in the coming months.

Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss subjects like this? Attend the co-located 5G Expo, IoT Tech Expo, Blockchain Expo, AI & Big Data Expo, and Cyber Security & Cloud Expo World Series with upcoming events in Silicon Valley, London, and Amsterdam.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

View Comments
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *